Archive for the ‘Eddie Jordan’ Category

Jordan resigns!

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

DA Jordan steps down; will spend time with family, take private sector job
Posted by The Times-Picayune October 29, 2007 9:00AM
Categories: Breaking News

Embattled New Orleans District Eddie Jordan told staff members just minutes ago that he will resign, abruptly ending his controversial tenure as part of a deal with city officials and private business leaders to pay off the $3.7 million civil rights court judgment his office owes to former employees, said staff members and sources close to the talks between Jordan, Mayor Ray Nagin and business leaders.

The historic move will end a 4-year stint tenure mired in criticism over a failure to prosecute violent criminals, chronic turnover in his office and, most recently, the bizarre disclosure that a robbery suspect fled to Jordan’s house, and a day later became a suspect in the shooting of a police officer.

District attorney’s spokesman Dalton Sawvoir confirmed the resignation and said that Jordan would be replaced by First Assistant District Attorney Keva Landrum, who will serve as both first assistant and acting DA. A source said that Landrum has agreed not to run for the job whenever an election is held.

[more]

Related:

Keva Landrum Johnson set to become New Orleans’ first female DA
Posted by The Times-Picayune October 30, 2007 2:08PM
By John Pope, The Times-Picayune

Thief sheltered by D.A. shoots NOPD officer

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

Robbery suspect fled to DA’s house
The Times-Picayune
Posted by Brendan McCarthy October 24, 2007 4:35PM

A man New Orleans police believe committed an armed robbery — and afterward fled to the home of District Attorney Eddie Jordan — is also a suspect in the home invasion and shooting of a police officer and his wife a day later, several police sources confirmed Wednesday.

The bizarre confluence of events began the evening of Oct. 11, according to those sources and police documents obtained by The Times-Picayune.

The 20-year-old man stopped by Jordan’s house minutes after he allegedly fled after an armed robbery outside a nearby Shell gas station. He arrived at Jordan’s house on foot, having run away after the robbery victim rammed his sport utility vehicle into the car carrying the suspect, police documents said.

Investigators later also connected the suspect, Elton Phillips, to an eastern New Orleans robbery and shooting by two gunmen, who critically wounded a police officer and shot the officer’s wife in the foot after breaking into their home late at night.

On Wednesday, Jordan said he didn’t know Phillips, and didn’t know Phillips had allegedly committed armed robbery shortly before arriving at his home. The district attorney said his longtime girlfriend Cherylynn Robinson knows Phillips, and she in fact had spent Oct. 11 — her birthday — with him and his relatives in Baton Rouge. He said Robinson is not related to Phillips.

[More]

Eddie Jordan defaults on liability to fired workers

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007

DA Eddie Jordan says office can’t pay $3.7 million to fired workers
Posted by The Times-Picayune October 23, 2007 2:59PM

By Gwen Filosa
Staff writer

Orleans Parish District Attorney Eddie Jordan’s office is running out of time in delaying payment of the $3.7 million award it owes to the dozens of white employees who successfully sued him for wrongfully firing them after he took office.

The plaintiffs are through waiting, their attorneys said Tuesday, warning that they will seek to seize assetts - from payroll accounts to cars - if Jordan’s office does not come up with the cash.

[more]

Metropolitan Crime Commission again criticizes criminal justice resources wasted on lesser offenses

Monday, October 1st, 2007

Panel calling for police, DA to focus on serious crimes
Posted by The Times-Picayune October 01, 2007 9:05PM

By Laura Maggi
Staff writer

While both NOPD Superintendent Warren Riley and District Attorney Eddie Jordan focus their anti-crime rhetoric on the pursuit of violent criminals, a study of the arrests and prosecutions in the first half of 2007 shows that police officers and prosecutors are targeting people who commit lower-level offenses.

–Half of the 15,225 arrests made by the New Orleans Police Department in the second quarter of 2007 were for traffic and municipal offenses, about the same level as during the first three months of the year, according to the analysis by the Metropolitan Crime Commission to be released today.

–Also in the second quarter, which was April through June, the NOPD made 3,197 arrests for more serious offenses, defined as those resulting in a state charge. About 70 percent of those arrests were in felony crimes that can lead to significant jail time.

–A review of cases accepted by the district attorney’s office for the same three-month period shows prosecutors accepted slightly more misdemeanor cases — which seldom result in jail time — than felony cases, the study showed.

The report concludes that both the district attorney’s office and NOPD need to focus their attention on locking up the most serious criminals, particularly since violent crime rose this year.

“The only chance that the criminal justice system has to remove some of the worst offenders is through a violent crime conviction,” said Rafael Goyeneche, president of the Metropolitan Crime Commission, a nonprofit watchdog group based in New Orleans. “That is the only category of crime that if you are convicted usually results in a jail sentence.”

The Crime Commission began tracking criminal cases in New Orleans in January, finding in an earlier report that the NOPD made more arrests in the first three months of 2007 than during a similar period before Hurricane Katrina, once an adjustment was made for the city’s smaller population.

The number of arrests was up in the second period examined by the commission in 2007, growing from 14,187 arrests made in the first quarter to 15,225 arrests in the second quarter of this year.

Goyeneche called the level of arrests — and the apparent focus on minor violations — troubling, as the practice hasn’t helped stem violent crime. During the six months when police were making all of these arrests, the number of reported rapes, armed robberies and assaults in New Orleans rose, while the murder rate held steady.

Not only are the arrests not helping the NOPD stop violent crimes, they could be harmful, Goyeneche said.

Arresting people who could have received only citations for traffic offenses or breaking municipal ordinances can hurt the NOPD’s relationship with the local community, Goyeneche said, adding that citizens who are arrested for minor violations can end up on a jury or as a witness to a crime, and their own experiences with police might cause them to be skeptical of the prosecution’s case.

Minor arrests take time

The report also noted that it often takes a minimum of one hour for a police officer to bring someone to Central Lock-Up. Every officer who arrests a traffic offender is tied up at the jail instead of being out on the street as a crime deterrent or investigating serious offenses, Goyeneche said.

Riley, who declined through a spokesman to comment for this story, has said he agrees that his officers shouldn’t focus on arresting what he calls “good quality” citizens for minor offenses. An NOPD spokesman defined good citizens as people who are generally law-abiding, a “working man or woman who does not have continued infractions of the law.”

The superintendent in June asked the City Council to allow his officers to issue “second chance” warnings to people they stop and then discover are wanted for minor offenses, such as not paying a fine or showing up for a traffic-related court date. A spokeswoman for Councilman James Carter said the council has asked state Attorney General Charles Foti for an opinion about whether a change in the city ordinance would be proper.

However, the NOPD already had that discretion in the vast majority of the 15,392 traffic and municipal arrests for the first six months of 2007, according to the Crime Commission analysis.

About 5,700 of the arrests were required by law, including 3,764 attachments because people were wanted by the Orleans Parish municipal and traffic courts, often for failing to pay fines. Some 1,309 were domestic violence incidents, and 630 were for driving while intoxicated.

For the rest of the more than 9,600 arrests, the NOPD officers could have issued citations or court summonses, the report concluded.

With the NOPD’s renewed focus on community policing, which involves trying to build better relationships with the people living in crime-ridden neighborhoods, officers have been instructed to focus their time on serious crimes, said Sgt. Joe Narcisse, a department spokesman. This mandate has been communicated by the command staff to the rank and file, he said.

“That does continue to be our focus,” Narcisse said. “But we still live in this city. Everyone must still be lawful. There will be arrests that are unavoidable.”

Misdemeanors prosecuted

The Crime Commission’s report also focused on activity at the district attorney’s office in the second quarter, although the prosecutions evaluated probably would be a different batch of cases than the arrests made during that period. The overall number of cases accepted rose in the second quarter, from 1,813 to 1,964, including a marked increase in acceptance of felony cases.

But the report notes that 51 percent of accepted cases were misdemeanors, which are less serious crimes. And while Jordan’s office improved its acceptance of felony cases in general, they accepted 16 fewer violent felony cases in the second quarter compared with the first three months.

Ralph Brandt, the head of the trials division at the district attorney’s office, said the office is trying to devote resources to convicting violent felons. But they still must prosecute many misdemeanor cases, he said.

“If you are going to tell me we shouldn’t be prosecuting a class of misdemeanors, the solution for that is the MCC or another citizen group have that crime decriminalized,” Brandt said. “It is our job to enforce and prosecute all laws.”

One of the more critical aspects of the Crime Commission’s evaluation of the district attorney’s office was looking at the dismissal rates versus conviction rates. The report noted that out of the 691 cases that were closed in the second quarter, 39 percent were dismissed.

Perhaps more telling, 51 percent of violent felony cases closed between January and June were dismissed. During that time, the DA’s office was able to secure convictions in 12 killings, 11 rapes and 34 robberies. They also dropped 14 homicide cases, eight rapes and 36 robberies.

‘Extraordinarily high’

The report calls the dismissal rates “extraordinarily high,” saying Jordan must find ways to work with the NOPD to reduce the number of cases that are dropped.

Brandt noted that the level of dismissals shrank from the first quarter to the second, saying that some of the older cases — particularly those that date back before Hurricane Katrina — are no longer viable.

“None of us as prosecutors like to dismiss a case, whether it is a crime of violence or non-violent,” Brandt said. “We never like to throw in the towel, but sometimes you are left with no other options.”

Violent crime cases often involve reluctant witnesses and victims. When cases are initially screened, Jordan has a policy to accept many cases even when the victims or witnesses are somewhat hesitant to testify, hoping that the prosecutor will be able to hold the case together, Brandt said. “Oftentimes those cases develop problems as witnesses change their mind as time drags on,” he said.

Brandt added that one thing the report does not reflect is the number of significant jail sentences recently handed down by judges at Criminal District Court when Orleans Parish prosecutors successfully prosecute violent offenders. “We are continuing to strive to make that number go up,” he said.

Jordan asks Supreme Court to overturn racism conviction

Friday, September 28th, 2007

DA will take case to high court
Plaintiffs’ attorneys call appeal long shot

The Times-Picayune
Friday, September 21, 2007
By Gwen Filosa
Staff writer

Orleans Parish District Attorney Eddie Jordan will ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his appeal to the $3.5 million jury verdict his office owes to dozens of white employees he fired in 2003.

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday denied Jordan’s request for a rehearing before the entire court.

Jordan’s only chance now to beat the verdict is at the nation’s highest court, which takes up a select number of cases each year for review and only if they concern a constitutional issue.

Jordan’s office said Thursday it will ask the 5th Circuit to freeze the jury’s award while he seeks what the plaintiffs’ attorneys call a long-shot appeal in Washington, D.C.

The 5th Circuit’s ruling means the stay imposed on collecting the $3.5 million expires Sept. 26, said plaintiffs’ attorney Clement Donelon. He said Jordan’s options to avoid the pay-out are drying up.

“The 5th Circuit can stay it for 90 days,” said Donelon, the lead attorney for plaintiff Judith DeCorte and 42 other fired employees. “But he has got to convince the judges who just ruled for us that he could eventually win at the Supreme Court.”

Donelon said the plaintiffs’ attorneys are prepared to “take all steps” to obtain the $3.5 million judgment, including seizing the office’s assets, which may include bank accounts.

“They’re going to make us go through all the steps required before they do anything,” Donelon said of Jordan’s team. “I haven’t gotten a call, I haven’t gotten a letter about any attempt to satisfy the district court’s judgment.”

Jordan’s office has no insurance to pay the verdict, Donelon said.

Unless the Supreme Court intervenes, Jordan must pay $1.9 million in back pay and damages to 35 employees he fired in 2003, but interest and attorney fees have risen to $3.5 million during the appeals process. The 5th Circuit ordered Jordan to pay additional attorney fees to the plaintiffs to cover the costs of the most recent appeal, which are estimated at more than $58,000.

A three-judge panel of the 5th Circuit last month upheld the verdict that Jordan violated civil rights law by firing the 43 workers and replacing them with black workers without a fair interview process. Forty-two of those who lost their jobs were white and one was Hispanic.

Days after becoming the city’s first black district attorney in January 2003, Jordan made sweeping changes in his support staff, cleaning house at the office led for 29 years by Harry Connick. The firings included 20 white investigators who had worked under Connick for years. Jordan hired 10 black investigators and kept five black investigators already on staff.

A jury in U.S. District Court in 2005 found him liable for employment discrimination based on race, despite Jordan’s defense that he made political decisions to hire loyalists and that most happened to be black.

Jordan was sued as the district attorney and not personally, so he must request the money from either the state Legislature or the New Orleans City Council.

The lawsuit brought out the fact that Jordan had allowed an aide to his political mentor U.S. Rep. William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, to oversee his post-election hirings and firings.

Jordan, though, kept all of the attorneys who stayed after Connick’s retirement and several department heads, who are white.

Although Jordan hired attorneys from the Chaffe McCall law firm to represent him at trial, he called upon two of his criminal appeals attorneys to argue on his behalf before the 5th Circuit at a hearing in April.

The 5th Circuit upheld the jury’s verdict Aug. 15, and made quick work of deciding not to grant a rehearing before the full court. Jordan asked for a rehearing Aug. 28.

A silver-lining for D.A.’s office — or a slivered lining?

Friday, September 28th, 2007

Finding a silver lining for DA’s office
The Times-Picayune
Thursday, September 20, 2007
By Gwen Filosa
[excerpted]

EDDIE WHO? Six candidates vying for a wide-open Criminal District Court judgeship played nice at their first public meeting Monday night at a Lee Circle hotel.

During the half-hour event, hosted by the Alliance for Good Government, the candidates stuck to typical stump speeches. No cheap shots. No name-calling.

Yet one name was conspicuously absent from the campaign gabfest: Jordan, who wants his second-in-command, Gaynell Williams to fill the court’s vacant Section A seat.

Jordan didn’t attend the event and no one brought up the fact that he is Williams’ boss, including the candidate herself.

Williams, in her first bid for public office, touted her 20 years of experience as a prosecutor, first in Jefferson Parish and later at the U.S. attorney’s office, where she was working when Jordan asked her to be his first assistant five years ago.

And while she dropped the name of former U.S. Attorney Harry Rosenberg, who “recruited” her in 1992, she never mentioned Jordan’s name when it came to her present job.

Juana Marine Lombard, a former public defender with her own private practice, took one gentle swipe at the district attorney’s office while making her pitch.

“The crime rate is on the rise and we seem to be having trouble keeping violent offenders in jail, or more specifically prosecuting them,” Lombard said.

Lombard eventually won the group’s endorsement.

Lombard and Williams have plenty of competition for the job. The field also includes former Criminal Court Judge Morris Reed and defense attorneys Joseph Rome, Donald Sauviac, Gary Wainwright and Laurie White. Sauviac was a no-show on Monday.

The winner will replace Judge Charles Elloie, who retired in June, ending a state investigation into his questionable bond-setting practices.

Jordan’s First Assistant D.A.’s respond to criticism

Friday, September 28th, 2007

Letters responding to the Gwen Filosa article printed in The Times-Picayune, “Prosecutor juggles cases beset by delays and witness problems”:

Prosecutor outlines days leading to resignation
Friday, September 21, 2007

Re: “Orleans DA loses another attorney: Judge decries office’s lack of preparation,” Metro, Sept. 20.

Based on the story, I feel compelled to explain why I abruptly resigned from the district attorney’s office.

On Sept. 12 and 13, I had the privilege of trying the case of State v. Rudolph Wade with my colleague, friend and fellow member of the Violent Offender Unit, Mary Glass.

Rudolph Wade is the first cold hit DNA rape case in the State of Louisiana to go to trial. At 9 p.m. Sept. 13, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of forcible rape.

While in trial on Rudolph Wade, I was also diligently preparing for the trial of State v. Eddie Harrison which was set for trial the following Tuesday, Sept. 18. Specifically, I was attempting to resolve open discovery matters.

I successfully accomplished this while in trial on the Rudolph Wade matter and received the missing materials late on Friday, Sept. 14.

For having done my job in the most diligent and efficient manner under the circumstances, I was placed in a position of defending my office’s failures in front of Judge Julian Parker Sept. 18.

Then on Sept. 19, I was expected to be prepared to try a homicide case before Judge Camille Buras. Even with 10 years of experience and 117 trials, this was impossible.

Shortly before my abrupt resignation, I received a phone call from defense counsel on the trial of State v. Michael Davis stating she had not received complete discovery in that matter.

The Davis case is set for trial before Judge Julian Parker on Tuesday, Sept. 25. Hearing that, I knew I could not walk in front of Judge Parker, a judge for whom I have a great deal of respect, and explain to him the exact same failings of my office that had occurred Sept. 18.

I have had enough. My physical health and emotional well-being are not worth $80,000. Neither is my professional reputation.

Cate L. Bartholomew
New Orleans

##########

DA has time on his hands?
Tuesday, September 25, 2007

We have a completely dysfunctional district attorney’s office whose leader — according to the story about overworked prosecutor Francis X. deBlanc III — “sat behind his prosecutors in the front row of the courtroom for several hours.”

Perhaps District Attorney Eddie Jordan should spend these hours more productively by pitching in and doing his job, prosecuting some of these cases himself to help his assistant district attorneys and the citizens of New Orleans.

If he doesn’t want to get back in the courtroom, perhaps he should spend the hours looking for secretaries, staff, volunteers, computers and copy machines so his assistant district attorneys can concentrate on putting criminals in jail where they belong.

Joel P. Loeffelholz
New Orleans

##########

Like an army, DA’s office needs selfless soldiers
Wednesday, September 26, 2007

Re: “Off-target at the DA’s office,” Other Opinions, Sept. 21.

In his guest column, Harry Tervalon Jr. invoked the memory of his father’s World War II service in an apparent attempt to suggest that the New Orleans criminal justice system, especially the Police Department and district attorney’s office, are in need of additional resources.

What Mr. Tervalon should also have invoked was the well-known call to arms “when the going gets tough the tough get going.”

Without a doubt the entire criminal justice system needs additional resources. However, the critical need at this point in time is human resources. The New Orleans Police Department needs police officers, and the district attorney needs prosecutors.

Rather than reiterate hackneyed complaints regarding working conditions, Mr. Tervalon could have better honored the selfless spirit of our World War II veterans by honoring his commitment to improve the experience level of the district attorney’s office instead of bolting back to his private practice after a mere month on the job.

Prosecutors swear an oath to defend the Constitution and uphold the laws of this state and the United States. There is no place in a prosecutor’s office for an attorney, such as Mr. Tervalon, who believes that his personal ethics prevent him from prosecuting certain categories of citizens.

During his brief stay at the district attorney’s office Mr. Tervalon did not try any cases, did not facilitate good relations with anyone and did not honor his commitment to join the battle against crime.

Working in any branch of city government post-Katrina is a tough job.

The general public should know the criminal justice system has at every level individuals who, unlike Mr. Tervalon, show up to work every day committed to confront the difficulties with which they are confronted and work toward making the city a safer and better place.

Keva Landrum and Val Solino
First Assistant District Attorneys
District Attorney’s Office
New Orleans

Prosecutor juggles cases beset by delays and witness problems

Monday, September 24th, 2007

Prosecutor juggles cases beset by delays and witness problems
The Times-Picayune
Posted by Gwen Filosa, staff writer
September 23, 2007 9:47PM

Assigned to represent the state of Louisiana at hearings in three separate high-profile murder cases — all set for the same morning — Francis X. deBlanc III braved a thicket of criminal justice dysfunction all by himself on Friday.

The veteran trial lawyer, who returned to the Orleans Parish district attorney’s office in June after a lengthy stretch in private civil law, trudged through a day of slings and arrows.

As one of the few seasoned lawyers in an office plagued by chronic turnover, deBlanc had to juggle three of the city’s most sensational post-Katrina murder cases:

– A teen accused of blasting away at a family traveling in a car, killing a popular musician.

– A mother accused of giving her son the gun he used to shoot another Central City boy.

– A Central City man accused of massacring five teens as they sat in a sport utility vehicle in the predawn hours of a day in June 2006.

This was deBlanc’s work pile for the day: three cases beset by delays and witness problems, all of which cast New Orleans under a national microscope because of the merciless nature of the crimes.

As if that load weren’t enough, deBlanc, 35, soon found himself facing another kind of pressure that has increasingly weighed on Orleans Parish prosecutors: judges fed up that the overworked, understaffed lawyers of District Attorney Eddie Jordan’s office are holding up the courts’ dockets.

And this time, it got personal.

Shuttling among three cases — with three different judges, on three different floors — deBlanc found himself the target of an arrest warrant issued by Judge Julian Parker, who was exasperated by deBlanc’s absence from his courtroom while the prosecutor scurried around the courthouse, attending to the other cases.

Judge Lynda Van Davis indicated she was spoiling to do the same, though she never issued a warrant.

The threat of being held in contempt of court tightened the squeeze on deBlanc. In addition to negotiating vexing legal issues in a triad of heinous and convoluted murder cases, he now faced the possibility of getting dragged into one of the hearings by a police escort and bound in handcuffs. At worst, he could wind up in jail.

That result would have been extreme even for the courthouse at Tulane and Broad, but the frustrations and headaches of deBlanc’s day were hardly unusual for Orleans Parish prosecutors at Criminal District Court.

Such problems help explain why so much often appears to go wrong there, and why there is so much turnover in the ranks of prosecutors, even the experienced, relatively well-paid ones whom Jordan has hired for his Violent Offender Unit.

Five lawyers have quit the unit in recent weeks, most recently Cate Bartholomew, one of Jordan’s most experienced prosecutors, who joined the office about three months ago specifically to work on the elite unit dedicated to cases involving homicides, rapes and shootings.

In a letter to the editor published in Friday’s Times-Picayune, Bartholomew described repeatedly being “placed in a position of defending my office’s failures” before a judge.

“I have had enough,” she wrote. “My physical health and emotional well-being are not worth $80,000. Neither is my professional reputation.”

Questioning key witness

DeBlanc’s Friday had begun in Judge Raymond Bigelow’s second-floor courtroom, with the prosecutor questioning the key witness — a 15-year-old girl — in the murder of Dinerral Shavers, the Hot 8 Brass Band drummer killed in December.

Shavers, 25, caught a fatal bullet to the head while driving his family along Dumaine Street the evening of Dec. 28. The crime helped inspire thousands of citizens to march on City Hall a few weeks later to demand action to quell the city’s escalating violence.

The young witness had already evaded the state’s grasp once. In June, Jordan’s office dropped the charges against David Bonds after the girl’s mother refused to let her daughter identify a killer in a city where witnesses have good reason to fear retribution.

In Bigelow’s courtroom Friday, Bonds, 18, sat in his gray, jail-issued clothes while deBlanc questioned the teenage witness, who clearly was agitated. In an attempt to comfort her, Bigelow cleared his courtroom and locked the door.

A group of reporters, lawyers and court watchers waited outside until the girl finished answering questions from deBlanc and two defense lawyers.

While deBlanc worked that case, Parker had been stewing in Section G, waiting to hear pleadings in the case of the mother who supposedly provided a gun to her son. Fed up with deBlanc’s truancy, Parker issued a warrant for the prosecutor’s arrest.

“Everyone wants me,” deBlanc told a deputy who came into Bigelow’s Section I courtroom at midday with orders to deliver him to Parker’s section immediately. “Lynda (Van Davis) is threatening to throw me in jail. There’s one of me.”

‘I’ll pray for you, Francis’

Indeed, Van Davis had been at work on the third floor in Section B, where the suspect in the Central City massacre of five teens, Michael Anderson, 20, also sat waiting for deBlanc to arrive to take care of motions in his first-degree murder case, which was still pending a trial date.

Although Van Davis didn’t go as far as Parker, deBlanc had heard through the courthouse grapevine that she was considering issuing a warrant to compel his presence in her courtroom: a somewhat common threat made by jurists trying to reach the end of their daily dockets.

Back in Bigelow’s courtroom, the deputy listened to deBlanc’s rejoinder and offered the only help he could: “I’ll pray for you, Francis,” he said, walking off.

As deBlanc made his way out of Bigelow’s courtroom, the judge wished him well. But he offered no help in soothing the prosecutor’s relations with other judges.

“Once you’re out the door, you’re on your own,” Bigelow told deBlanc as Jordan, the district attorney, calmly sat behind his prosecutors in the front row of the courtroom for several hours. He remained silent as the pressure rained down on one of his top prosecutors.

In his courtroom downstairs, Parker continued to fume over deBlanc’s tardiness. But the judge would have to keep waiting. Despite Parker’s threat to have deBlanc brought before him in handcuffs, another murder case beckoned.

‘Waiting all day’

As with the case against Bonds, the suspect in the Shavers killing, deBlanc needed to salvage the case against Anderson, which the DA had dropped when the sole eyewitness strayed from prosecutors’ reach in July. Jordan’s team revived the case only after the witness turned up as the star of a news conference staged by the New Orleans Police Department, vowing that she had wanted all along to take the witness stand against Anderson.

Entering Van Davis’ courtroom, deBlanc was ready to energize the case’s second life. Instead, he got a lifeline of his own.

Bobby Freeman, deBlanc’s supervisor in the Violent Offender Unit, was already in court, ready to handle the Anderson case. So as Freeman prepared for a hearing during which he would hand over crime scene photos to the defense, deBlanc ventured off to face more vexing issues in the murder case against Clarence Johnson, 17, and his mother, Vanessa Johnson.

Of course, the most immediate issue was an irritated Parker.

“I’ve been stuck in Section I,” deBlanc told the judge when he arrived after 2 p.m., dashing in from the antique elevator and pulling along his wheeled file carrier.

DeBlanc told the judge he needed a few minutes to confer with the detective on the Johnsons’ case.

“DeBlanc, we’ve been waiting all day for this hearing,” Parker said as the victims’ family watched from the audience. “After all I’ve been through with you on this case, you haven’t spoken with the detective?”

“I’ve not spoken to him today,” deBlanc corrected.

When deBlanc exited for a brief huddle with the officer, Parker shared his ire with a bunch of defense lawyers.

“I can’t even get the DAs to approach,” he said. “I’ve been sitting here all day.”

‘Fear of retaliation’

DeBlanc’s day in Parker’s court didn’t improve much. In proceeding with murder charges against the Johnsons, who are both accused in the murder of 17-year-old Robert Dawson in February, his case against the mother — accused of giving her son a gun and telling him to use it — suffered a blow.

The state’s only cooperating eyewitness — who had been in jail, held on a $250,000 “material witness bond” enacted by Jordan’s office to keep him from disappearing — testified that Clarence Johnson killed his friend Dawson on the evening of Feb. 7 after the pair had scrapped on a basketball court outside the Guste public housing complex.

But the witness, a young man in handcuffs and jailhouse orange, contradicted the detective who had taken the stand right before him, saying he had never told police that he watched Clarence’s mother hand him a gun with the instructions to “go get them all”: a story that has become gospel in the minds of detectives and the public. That alleged exchange, relayed by police the day of the shooting, represents the linchpin of the murder charges against Johnson’s mother.

Another young man from the neighborhood witnessed Dawson’s killing, but his mother told police she would never let her son speak to detectives, let alone testify.

Not in this neighborhood, the mother said.

“For fear of retaliation, for where they live at,” Detective Ron Ruiz said on the witness stand, having waited almost six hours to testify while deBlanc was upstairs on the Shavers murder case.

Attorney eludes arrest

Parker freed the witness to Robert Dawson’s killing from jail after deBlanc retracted the material-witness bond meant to keep the young man from drifting away.

And deBlanc ended up escaping arrest. Parker’s warrant had become moot the moment he entered the courtroom.

In the end the Johnsons and Bonds were both scheduled to go on trial in November. Anderson’s case got stuck on pretrial appeals and was slated for more hearings next month.

In the face of a harrowing schedule, deBlanc appeared remarkably cool-headed as Friday morning faded into late afternoon, and work on all three cases got done.

His schedule this week includes more hearings in murder cases in the cavernous old courthouse at Tulane and Broad.

Gwen Filosa can be reached at gfilosa@timespicayune.com or (504) 826-3304.

Trial hits snag in shooting of officer

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007

Trial hits snag in shooting of officer
Judge puts blame on district attorney’s office
The Times-Picayune
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
By Laura Maggi
Staff writer

The attempted murder trial of a 25-year-old man accused of shooting New Orleans police officer Andres Gonzalez stalled Tuesday amid what the presiding judge complained were endemic procedural failings by the Orleans Parish district attorney’s office.

The defendant, Eddie Allen Harrison III, was not brought into the courtroom from jail because District Attorney Eddie Jordan’s office didn’t file proper paperwork. But even if Harrison had appeared, the case couldn’t have gone forward, as the public defender only on Friday received a forensic test from the shooting, and a videotape recording of the incident appears to be lost by police.

“Y’all figure out more different ways not to go to trial,” Judge Julian Parker told Assistant District Attorney Cate Bartholomew.

Parker complained that prosecutors too often ask for continuances because they need to search for evidence, or have only just started to prepare. Although Bartholomew did not ask for a continuance, Parker ordered one, blaming the delay on the district attorney’s “gross negligence.”

Parker lectured Bartholomew about the office’s failings throughout his Tuesday morning session, although he repeatedly noted he was not disparaging her personally. Bartholomew was handed the Gonzalez case two weeks ago.

Bartholomew is part of a team of experienced prosecutors tapped for the Jordan’s Violent Offender Unit, which as of this July is handling all of the city’s homicide cases, as well as some other violent crimes. Prosecutors on the unit, created last February, were given a whole new set of homicide cases this summer. As a few attorneys have left the unit in recent weeks, some of the prosecutors have also taken on their caseload.

But Bobby Freeman, the supervisor of the unit, said most judges have been understanding of the challenges his team of prosecutors faced as they took on all new cases, many of them complicated.

“It is going to take a little time for us to get onto running ground on this. But I think we are well on our way,” Freeman said.

Bartholomew told the judge she intended to go to trial Tuesday and had all of the available physical evidence brought to the courtroom. According to the court record, there are several witnesses in the case, including both New Orleans Police Department officers and civilians, who identified Harrison during previous court proceedings.

After getting the case two weeks ago, Bartholomew said she was told one of her colleagues had taken care of the request to bring Harrison from the federal tier at Orleans Parish Prison to Criminal District Court. The U.S. Marshals Service office must receive the request to move a federal inmate three days before the court date. Harrison is being held in federal custody because he faces a gun charge at U.S. District Court, along with the attempted murder charge in state court.

Bartholomew also told Parker she was prepared to go to trial without the videotape, which contains surveillance video that might have captured the crime. The district attorney’s office never received this tape from the NOPD, she said.

Parker is scheduled to hold an evidentiary hearing about the lost tape on Sept. 28. The trial date is expected to be set after that hearing.

Harrison is accused of shooting Gonzalez in Algiers after the 4th District officer pulled him and a friend over in a traffic stop. The driver of the car, Joshua Hall, has been charged as an accessory to the attempted murder.

After they were pulled over on May 23, 2006, Hall stayed with police, according to the court record. But Harrison ran, with Gonzalez right behind him. The officer caught up with Harrison and they struggled. Police say Harrison pulled out a gun and fired off four rounds, hitting Gonzalez in the neck and arm. The officer is now paralyzed and uses a wheelchair.

Don Donnelly, the public defender handling Harrison’s case, said he received the lab results from a gunshot residue test on Friday, which isn’t enough time for him to determine whether to get an independent evaluation.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in New Orleans received the results from the lab in June, but Bartholomew said she also didn’t get a copy until Friday. Once she received it, she faxed them to the defense attorney.

The ATF bureau believes the report was turned over in June to a previous prosecutor handling the case, according to a source at the U.S. attorney’s office in New Orleans.

. . . . . . .

Laura Maggi can be reached at lmaggi@timespicayune.com or at (504) 826-3316.

DeBerry Owes Midura An Apology

Monday, July 23rd, 2007

Jarvis DeBerry’s column in the Sunday Times-Picayune left me with the same sickening reaction as I had to the heckling Jordan supporters at last week’s Criminal Justice Committee hearing.

Here’s my letter to the editor:

Even more disturbing than D.A. Eddie Jordan’s incompetence, and his petulance at answering basic questions asked by Council Members, are the accusations that those who criticize Jordan are racists (Jarvis DeBerry, 7/22/07).

I wish DeBerry would pay more attention to *what* Shelley Midura was saying, not *how* she said it.

The comparison to Nifong had to do with how Jordan jeopardized the administration of justice by publicly disparaging his witness as untruthful.

As for the deplorable remark about Midura’s State Department career, she was employed there for ten years. She probably has a fair libel suit against DeBerry for saying she couldn’t keep her job.

What would have been DeBerry’s reaction to Midura if, instead of expressing her outrage that five black teenagers mercilessly executed might not obtain justice, she said nothing. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

Violence diminishes all of us as human beings, as does the hateful prejudice displayed by DeBerry against a white woman who, despite her race, simply cares.

When people are vilified for caring, New Orleans will return to being the city that care forgot.

(HT: Moldy City for identifying Midura’s State Department career background — it’s right on her Web site. Did DeBerry do any research at all before launching his personal attack? That’s why I say he’s opened himself up to a pretty good defamation suit.)