Citizens as “co-creators rather than subjects”

Topics covered in this Citizen Crime Watch letter:

  1. We could use some more of that sunshine disinfectant around here.
  2. When the police respond to your 911 call, they’re already too late.
  3. Strike Against Crime on January 9th.
  4. Police Violence?
  5. Remembering Ja’Shawn Powell.

We could use some more of that sunshine disinfectant around here

Lessons learned. Painful lessons learned.

That’s one way to characterize the experience of living in post-Katrina New Orleans.

A vital question we need to ask ourselves here in New Orleans is what we can do to avoid another debacle such as the Nagin administration has been.

Aside from Ray Nagin’s deplorable disengagement in the post-Katrina recovery, a significant problem for citizens is the frustrating process of trying to guess where the recovery is happening, what’s broken in City Hall, and how they can try to fix the problems which impact the recovery and the quality of life in New Orleans.

It was exasperation of this kind which forced Karen Gadbois into the streets to document either ineptness, or corruption, in the city’s demolition process. Selected as one of Gambit Weekly’s New Orleanians of the Year, Gadbois demonstrated decisively that records really do matter. As geeky as that sounds, by painstakingly compiling records from various sources, and then validating those records on the ground, Gadbois and a small crew of activists were able to uncover systemic government malfeasance.

Thank you Karen! No one will ever really know how much time it took to do that work.

We need more citizen activists like Karen Gadbois. In the future, we need to prevent the obfuscation, foot-dragging, and “who, me?” attitudes which characterized Ray Nagin’s response to Gadbois’ revelations.

Fundamentally, we need to take personality out of the picture. Government transparency should no longer be a battle between personalities and political wills. It should be a fact of life, and the very essence of our democracy so that we can make more informed decisions.

There is only one way to create this kind of transparency in the future.

The answer is NolaStat.

NolaStat is a policy approach to governance and citizen engagement — a process, which uses government records — including crime records — published on the Internet in standard, structured formats, to foster greater government efficiency, to create the highest level of transparency possible, and to empower citizens to use those public records to innovatively identify and solve problems in a community-centered manner.

Yes, this is a revolutionary idea. No, it isn’t unheard of. In fact, the implementation of this kind of “democratizing data” process in Washington, D.C. is being celebrated as “the best example worldwide” of a technological solution to promote greater government efficiency, transparency, and accountability.

The D.C. CapStat model has been so revolutionary, that its proponents are now advising President-elect Obama. New Orleans should strive to join that movement ahead of other cities, by embracing NolaStat, and demonstrating that New Orleans is no longer a backwater of corruption, but is now a shining example to the rest of the country.

Right now, we desperately need someone like D.C.’s Chief Technology Officer, Vivek Kundra, running City Hall’s technology department — someone who doesn’t view citizens as the problem, but as part of the solution — as “co-creators rather than subjects.”

If sunshine is the best disinfectant, as Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis once said, then NolaStat is the window which allows the sunshine in on New Orleans government. And people like Karen Gadbois are the citizens who pull open the curtains.

This is about using technology to empower citizens, and to build new kinds of social networks. This is about change.

Together, yes we can build a better New Orleans, and by our example, we can help to guide the way to building a better nation.

Your opportunity to support the kind of change possible with NolaStat will come up next week, on Thursday, January 15th, when the NolaStat idea will be presented to the City Council’s Government Affairs Committee, thanks to Councilwoman Shelley Midura, and council aide, David Gavlinski. Additional details will be forthcoming. For now, mark your calendars.

When the police respond to your 911 call, they’re already too late

Question: When did it become acceptable for public officials to ignore citizens?

Answer: When did Mayor Ray Nagin and NOPD Superintendent Warren Riley become (to put it nicely) such ineffectual, peevish public officials?

Both Nagin and Riley have refused to respond to repeated requests to resolve the problem of crime under-reporting.

I don’t wish to be such a nag. I’ve sought cooperation from both Nagin and Riley. I have offered them solutions, and volunteered my assistance. They have rejected these offers, and worse, they have acted in a potentially criminally vindictive manner which does harm to the safety of all citizens.

Former NOPD Superintendent Richard Pennington’s deputy chief, Ronal Serpas, used to say that when the police show up to answer your 911 call, they’re already too late, which is to say, they’ve failed to prevent that crime from happening in the first place.

The first job of the police department should be to properly report all potential threats to public safety. Since the NOPD has done such a really piss-poor job of that, I’ve been arguing that the NOPD should just give up the records so we can do the job ourselves.

Because I found a significant difference between what Riley was reporting as official UCR statistics, and what was being reported on the city’s crime-mapping Web site, Riley decided to remove the records from the Web site.

When you go to the NOPD’s crime-mapping Web site now, you can’t even click on the map icons to get more information. This isn’t just incompetence — it’s egregious, willful negligence, which could place some unsuspecting citizen in the wrong place at the wrong time for lack of information about emerging crime problems.

Warren Riley has demonstrated such a lack of regard for the concerns of citizens, I can only ask why he wants to keep his job. It wouldn’t be hard to explain the challenges of being a police chief in New Orleans — if that were his excuse — and to advocate for reforms to improve the situation.

Instead, Riley has chosen the path of least resistance, leaving us to conclude that — like Nagin — his head is no longer in the game, and he’s just biding time until he can choose to resign at a time when there aren’t any controversies surrounding his leadership.

Strike Against Crime

Silence is Violence has some suggestions for how you can send a message to public officials about how poor their response to the crime problem has been since the 5000-strong March Against Violence to City Hall two years ago. Show your support for an end to violence, and for a serious approach to criminal justice reform. You don’t have to leave work to make a difference. You do, however, have to stand up and be counted.

Police Violence?

Citizens need to be patient in waiting for an independent investigation before drawing their own conclusions about the circumstances surrounding the police shooting and death of Adolph Grimes on New Year’s Day. I have posted my own brief comments on the Citizen Crime Watch blog (here and here).

Another complaint against the NOPD was issued by a Gentilly man who claimed, on WDSU’s Monday 10 p.m. newscast, that police tazed him and choked his wife.

Police officers have a right to defend themselves. That should be foremost in our minds, because they put themselves in harm’s way to deal with the worst kinds of people in order to protect us from harm. We should always be prepared, however, to question the limits of what constitutes protection, and what actions cross the line into abuse of authority. When the police harm citizens, abuse or threaten, it should come as no surprise why witnesses aren’t willing to cooperate with the police to secure prosecutions.

Both of these incidents should be independently reviewed. The shooting incident is being investigated by the FBI. The incidents again underscore the need for the Office of Independent Monitor to be filled as soon as possible.

Moreover, notwithstanding these latest incidents, there are a number of complaints I’ve heard from people in the community about police behavior which raise serious questions about chief Riley’s command control over the department. We were recently reminded of the spectre of rogue cops with Antoinette Frank’s attempt to again appeal her death penalty sentence. If Riley can’t control rogue elements in the police force, then he’s no longer an effective leader, and he should resign.

I am not calling for Riley to resign — necessarily. I have no illusions about how that would be received anyway. I am, however, calling on Riley to remember that the title “chief” in front of his name isn’t just a nice pay grade. I am calling on Riley to act like a leader.

Remembering Ja’Shawn Powell

The least we can do to remember two-year-old Ja’Shawn Powell, who was tragically and savagely murdered by his father, is to help his mother provide a proper burial for him, and hope that the criminal justice system doesn’t fail him. A memorial fund at Liberty Bank has been established to receive donations. Go to libertybank.net for a listing of locations, or mail your donation to Liberty Bank, P.O. Box 60131, New Orleans, La 70160.

Regards,
Brian Denzer
Founder/Executive Director
New Orleans Citizen Crime Watch
http://citizencrimewatch.org
5721 Magazine Street #205
New Orleans, LA 70115
citizencrimewatch@gmail.com

There were a number of suggestions offered in the last letter for how you can become involved in helping to improve the advocacy and crime-reporting services provided by New Orleans Citizen Crime Watch. Those needs remain unfulfilled. If you agree with the goals of Citizen Crime Watch, please help.

If you would like to be removed from this distribution list, or add others to the list, please just reply to citizencrimewatch@gmail.com.

8 Responses to “Citizens as “co-creators rather than subjects””

  1. GentillyGirl Says:

    NOLAStat- this is a great concept. I’ll be conversing with my Councilwoman’s office. (and Blogging it of course.)

  2. Brian Says:

    Awesome! Thanks for the help!

  3. Paul Tassin Says:

    Greetings, am checking in from Seattle. Got two questions: (1) Wouldn’t any crime statistics records created/held by the NOPD be subject to the LA public records disclosure statute? (2) There’s a member of my neighborhood’s blog (http://www.centraldistrictnews.org) who posts daily summaries of police and criminal activity reported via police scanner. Would it be possible/worthwhile to do the same in N.O.?

  4. Brian Says:

    Hi Paul. Nice to hear from you!

    Did you pass the bar?

    On public records — maybe. It’s never really been tested as far as I know, but would almost certainly go to the state supreme court, so one would have to be prepared for a protracted battle, although a battle which the City of New Orleans would have to pay costs for if the case were won in favor of the plaintiff. I have the relevant court cases here in Louisiana if you’d like to review them. The central issue will be protection of privacy, but I would make a public records request for electronic records which focuses on data fields which don’t violate privacy — and then, for location data such as addresses, I would request that the addresses be decimated (or rounded) to the nearest 100 block, or intersection.

    The Louisiana public records statute:
    http://www.legis.state.la.us/lss/lss.asp?doc=99632

    A review of the Louisiana public records statute:
    http://sunshinereview.org/index.php/Louisiana_Public_Records_Act

    Here’s a short summary I sent to someone else about the lower court ruling.

    LexisNexis(R) Hill v. East B.R. (2861:131609403):

    A lower court 19th Judicial District Court of Appeal decision contained an interesting dissent.

    The other judges ruled that the 911 calls were privileged *health care* communications. Guidry dissented that medical care was not provided by 911 operators, nor was medical information transmitted, therefore the communications were not protected as health care communications. This isn’t useful to me, other than to see that the defendants relied upon the content of the communications to argue against release. A public records request which eliminates privacy considerations might help (i.e., decimating/averaging addresses, and leaving out caller’s name).

    Guidry argued for a liberal interpretation of the public records law:

    Nor do I believe in this day and age that the majority is correct that a caller to 911 reasonably believes that information communicated via such a call will not be subject to public disclosure. We live in a society in which it is generally known that when an individual makes 911 calls for help to public agencies those calls are recorded. Further, written transcripts of 911 calls are widely published in the print media and audio copies of the actual calls are often replayed verbatim for the benefit of television and radio audiences. Therefore, generally, it is not reasonable to expect [*25] that a taped 911 phone call will be kept private.

    The La. Supreme Ct. denied the writ. The opinion wasn’t published, but there was one dissent: VICTORY, J.

  5. Paul Tassin Says:

    I’m taking the bar exam in a few weeks, but once that’s over I’d be interested in looking into this. Can you send me the citations for the cases? paulrtassin at gmail dot com. Great to keep in touch with you!

  6. carmenugt Says:

    I having been researching police scanners for New Orleans all day. I saw your post. Does anyone have n information of what type of portable police scanner to buy?
    I feel I need one in my home

  7. Brian Says:

    I don’t think they’re available. The NOPD started encrypting radio signals to prevent unauthorized use several years ago.

  8. farawayfriend Says:

    NolaStat looks great.

    I also really liked the notion that if you’ve had to call 911, the crime prevention plans in place have already failed.

    The way that the quote was phrased suggested that the speaker, a police officer, (and a cop with a really responsible and wonderful notion of what police officers should be doing to protect city residents), placed most of the onus on the cops.

    I’d like to put it back on the people a little. I’d hate to see a world that started to look like the Soviet Union, with neighbours informing on each other, but I do think that the way we live in our neighbourhoods plays a big role in keeping them safe or returning them to safety.

    When we walk or ride our bikes around, we act as “eyes on the street”. When we maintain our own homes, and not only keep them up, but get sensual and creative with our gardens and the colours we choose to paint things, when we create homes and streets and neighbourhoods that are lively and friendly, well walked, and full of basically good people looking out for each other…WE help to stop crime.

    Shopping within our neighbourhood to keep honest money circulating around for as long as possible (providing jobs for local kids or teens in local businesses) can help, as can making personal choices that are law abiding.

    Personally, I think it is dumb that pot is illegal. That said, it IS, and so choosing to smoke it connects you to people who are doing things much worse than growing a little weed…if you don’t like criminal gangs, think hard about casual pot use.

    You could kill someone the very first time you get behind the wheel drunk.

    If you don’t help the woman or kids you know are being beaten, they could end up dead next time…

    Criminals are mostly just people like us, who make dumb choices and reap serious consequences. If we think through our own conduct to minimize the ” that was criminally stupid” factor in our own lives, we help create a crime preventing culture.

    We all face daily personal choices that shape the safety and integrity of our families and communities.

    In big ways and in small ones– walking, cycling, shopping locally, hiring local kids, regularly going around to pick up litter, maintaining our homes, putting love and time into our gardens and community gardens, really understanding how our money is invested, really caring for the people we know, fighting and beating our addictions, refraining from the small and common criminal behaviors that are endemic in our culture…

    …in these ways, WE can live a life that creates a positive, crime free patch of city life…and with luck, other honest people will do the same. We don’t have to leave everything to the police.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.